<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for askLaLa</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.asklala.com/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.asklala.com/blog</link>
	<description>The reliable inside scoop on Manhattan real estate.  Contact us if you would like to participate!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 00:32:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on What are typical Coop Board financial requirements for coop buyers? by James R.</title>
		<link>http://www.asklala.com/blog/2010/07/30/what-are-typical-coop-board-financial-requirements-for-coop-buyers/comment-page-1/#comment-41344</link>
		<dc:creator>James R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 00:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asklala.com/blog/?p=504#comment-41344</guid>
		<description>Very apt post.  Co=op board vary widely in their financial requirements.  Best thing a buyer can do is be well informed.  Doesn&#039;t hurt to have lots of extra cash too!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very apt post.  Co=op board vary widely in their financial requirements.  Best thing a buyer can do is be well informed.  Doesn&#8217;t hurt to have lots of extra cash too!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Condo Development: The Lucida – 151 E. 85th Street, New York 10028 by Stefan</title>
		<link>http://www.asklala.com/blog/2007/12/18/new-development-the-lucida-%e2%80%93-151-e-85th-street/comment-page-1/#comment-39078</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 22:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asklala.com/blog/2007/12/18/new-development-the-lucida-%e2%80%93-151-e-85th-street/#comment-39078</guid>
		<description>I believe Peter Aaron at Cook+Fox had a lot of input with the Lucida. He is a good architect with a number of years as a Project Architect on many top projects at the Pei firm. For this reason, I believe the building deserves a little extra consideration.. most likely some worthwhile construction details here as there should be in this price range.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe Peter Aaron at Cook+Fox had a lot of input with the Lucida. He is a good architect with a number of years as a Project Architect on many top projects at the Pei firm. For this reason, I believe the building deserves a little extra consideration.. most likely some worthwhile construction details here as there should be in this price range.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on BrokersNYC prevails in antitrust conspiracy claims by Tai</title>
		<link>http://www.asklala.com/blog/2007/08/08/brokersnyc-prevails-in-antitrust-conspiracy-claims/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Tai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 19:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asklala.com/blog/2007/08/08/brokersnyc-prevails-in-antitrust-conspiracy-claims/#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Thanks Lala for your very courageous and determined stand for what&#039;s right
in the marketplace. It means a lot to all of us who are in business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Lala for your very courageous and determined stand for what&#8217;s right<br />
in the marketplace. It means a lot to all of us who are in business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on BrokersNYC prevails in antitrust conspiracy claims by David Barry</title>
		<link>http://www.asklala.com/blog/2007/08/08/brokersnyc-prevails-in-antitrust-conspiracy-claims/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>David Barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 23:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asklala.com/blog/2007/08/08/brokersnyc-prevails-in-antitrust-conspiracy-claims/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>This is good news for all those who want to see competition and choice in real estate.  BrokersNYC and Lala Wang have long supported the wide flow of real estate information for the benefit of consumers and agents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is good news for all those who want to see competition and choice in real estate.  BrokersNYC and Lala Wang have long supported the wide flow of real estate information for the benefit of consumers and agents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on BrokersNYC prevails in antitrust conspiracy claims by Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.asklala.com/blog/2007/08/08/brokersnyc-prevails-in-antitrust-conspiracy-claims/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asklala.com/blog/2007/08/08/brokersnyc-prevails-in-antitrust-conspiracy-claims/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>It’s clear that the interests of consumers and the interests of large brokerages are not aligned. Let’s hope that the consumer’s interests are respected here and we get a decision that is pro-competition and pro-market efficiency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s clear that the interests of consumers and the interests of large brokerages are not aligned. Let’s hope that the consumer’s interests are respected here and we get a decision that is pro-competition and pro-market efficiency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on BrokersNYC prevails in antitrust conspiracy claims by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.asklala.com/blog/2007/08/08/brokersnyc-prevails-in-antitrust-conspiracy-claims/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 19:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asklala.com/blog/2007/08/08/brokersnyc-prevails-in-antitrust-conspiracy-claims/#comment-8</guid>
		<description>This is just the first in what will hopefully be many victories against the conspiracy now in place among the big NYC brokers.  It was especially encouraging that Judge Sand did not take the easy way out and dismiss the conspiracy claims in the wake of the Supreme COurt&#039;s ruling in Leegin.
Once BrokersNYC wins its case, this will pave the way for sellers of NYC real estate to go after the big game: the 6% commission.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just the first in what will hopefully be many victories against the conspiracy now in place among the big NYC brokers.  It was especially encouraging that Judge Sand did not take the easy way out and dismiss the conspiracy claims in the wake of the Supreme COurt&#8217;s ruling in Leegin.<br />
Once BrokersNYC wins its case, this will pave the way for sellers of NYC real estate to go after the big game: the 6% commission.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Antitrust:  Klickads v. Real Estate Board of New York by Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.asklala.com/blog/antitrust-klickads-inc-v-real-estate-board-of-new-york/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 19:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asklala.com/blog/antitrust-klickads-inc-v-real-estate-board-of-new-york/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s clear that the interests of consumers and the interests of large brokerages are not aligned. Let&#039;s hope that the consumer&#039;s interests are respected here and we get a decision that is pro-competition and pro-market efficiency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s clear that the interests of consumers and the interests of large brokerages are not aligned. Let&#8217;s hope that the consumer&#8217;s interests are respected here and we get a decision that is pro-competition and pro-market efficiency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on BrokersNYC prevails in antitrust conspiracy claims by Anthony Longo</title>
		<link>http://www.asklala.com/blog/2007/08/08/brokersnyc-prevails-in-antitrust-conspiracy-claims/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Longo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 17:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asklala.com/blog/2007/08/08/brokersnyc-prevails-in-antitrust-conspiracy-claims/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Lala - congrats on the progress you are making with this very VALID and necessary point.  Keep driving it home...it needs to happen.  You always have our support!  Congratulations again and keep us posted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lala &#8211; congrats on the progress you are making with this very VALID and necessary point.  Keep driving it home&#8230;it needs to happen.  You always have our support!  Congratulations again and keep us posted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on BrokersNYC prevails in antitrust conspiracy claims by BrokersNYC prevails in antitrust conspiracy claims at Condo Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.asklala.com/blog/2007/08/08/brokersnyc-prevails-in-antitrust-conspiracy-claims/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>BrokersNYC prevails in antitrust conspiracy claims at Condo Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 17:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asklala.com/blog/2007/08/08/brokersnyc-prevails-in-antitrust-conspiracy-claims/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>[...] dismissal on charges concerning monopolization. The case will now be set for a jury trial.  Continue&#8230; If you are not familar with these ongoing actions &amp; history read [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] dismissal on charges concerning monopolization. The case will now be set for a jury trial.  Continue&#8230; If you are not familar with these ongoing actions &#38; history read [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rentals Web site files lawsuit over licensing requirement by Liz</title>
		<link>http://www.asklala.com/blog/2007/06/14/rentals-web-site-files-lawsuit-over-licensing-requirement/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 23:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asklala.com/blog/2007/06/14/rentals-web-site-files-lawsuit-over-licensing-requirement/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Ridiculous... and typical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ridiculous&#8230; and typical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

